![]() ![]() There are also semi-deponent verbs, which lack active forms in the perfect tenses, but otherwise have active forms in the present tense. These verbs are usually indicated as such in the dictionary with with "dep." somewhere or otherwise just giving the principal parts without active forms, such as obliviscor, oblitus. There are a whole slew of these verbs, including loquor, sequor, and gradior. These verbs look passive, but they are in fact active in meaning. ![]() Obliviscor falls into the category of verbs known as deponent verbs. It's not that the active is missing with obliviscor, rather, it lacks active forms. You just discovered one here, except it's backwards. I hope my questions are not too stupid.īonus questions: why are the active indicative and subjunctive so rich for "víncere", but almost nonexistent for "oblīvīscēns/oblīvīscéntis"? Can't "to forget" be active in Latin?Īll natural languages, Latin included, have some irregularities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |